You need an account to post a reply. One "M201N" (with the square pattern on the grille) and one "M201.N.2" (with the circular random pattern on the grille) and they sound quite different. Sixties M160, compared to 2001 M160 and 2010 M160. Decent shockmounts can actually improve the sound you get from your mics, but they can be expensive and not always durable. This item is sold As-Described and cannot be returned unless it arrives in a condition different from how it was described or photographed. When the TGs first came out we compared them (I worked for the largest Beyer seller in the east at the time) and we felt that the differences were small but we felt that the earlier pre-TG models were a little more detailed. I also have a M201 that was second hand in 2001 and one I bought new in 2008. Yeah, the RE16 rocked it on snare today. For me the 201 is the perfect snare mic and it's a great mic on a number of other applications, even on kick. Monkey urine only I'm afraid, though they do provide a monkey with every purchase just in case you come across any stray 57s, i5s or 201s masquerading as snare mics! These are the qualities that have led many people to select the M 201 TG as an alternative to condenser microphones and enabled them to enjoy the strengths of the dynamic pendant. You can get further back for a more natural tone and the rejection is comparable to cardioid mics. The two Midas 500 racks are front and center in the meter bridge on my 40-channel Soundcraft console. The M201 is a dynamic instrument microphone with a hypercardioid pickup pattern. The Sm57 captures the mid and high voice of the speaker. You can get further back for a more natural tone and the rejection is comparable to cardioid mics. View fullsize. This makes them good for drums and amps, but not so good for something like a voice. This is a very rare mic. I think I'm over using the 201 on snare for now. Can't seem to find any info online and little on here. Looks like I'm definitely over the M201 phase. the pre's i would use on my snare would be either an original neve 1272 or an api 3124. The M201 is a versatile live mic, excellent … The Beyer M201 is considered the fancyman's SM57. I guess our basic philosophy is: see what it needs, and don't rule out anything at first. And for good reason - flatter response, extremely high SPL output, hypercardiod pattern. The Sm57 retails for a whopping £130 and the 58 for a staggering £150. The M 201 TG is particularly effective when the microphone has to be placed at a distance from the sound source. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered. I've been using the 57 for some time (years) and after I got a couple of 201's I've never used anything else on snare. High-quality headphones, microphones, and conference systems made in Germany. i tried both mics as a replacement for a 57 and chose the beyer m201. So there is a slight difference. The 57 sounds okay on snare, but the problem I've had was the hi hat bleed that sounds really nasty in the 57. They take very, very high SPL and sound clear and undistorted even on very loud sources. Sound matters. Pictures Of Mic'ed Up Drum Kits In The Studio. Less of that honk but still not pleasing. I own a few of the older M-69 and M-88 models and though I like the 201, I just never bought one, but it is a lovely mic. TG (Tour Group) models were a response to the relative delicateness of the standard Beyer models. This item is sold As-Described. It uses a low-mass diaphragm made of Hostaphan (a polyester film similar to Mylar) and a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference from nearby AC sources. Selecting drum mics has to do with the whole picture you're getting off the kit. whenever I need them, as well as my own AT4050, Line Audio OM1, M-Audio Sputnik and SE R1, so the M88 seems a very interesting all-rounder to have, and a different option to what the studios I … I also love the 441 on snare and always use it for that. The station people put up two RE20s spaced a couple of feet apart and a couple of feet away from me. That experience really soured me on RE20s forever. Comes … This microphone is great on taming harsh percussion, and it is almost ribbon sounding. Can't believe how cool these were. As a member of the M series, the M 201 TG embodies natural sound reproduction like no other dynamic microphone.It reproduces signals with exceptional clarity and detail. I've reached the point of being bored with the 201, at least on snare. The M201 is an all around workhorse, and is one of the best studio snare head mics out there, but tough enough for the stage as well. Click here to login, The ability to reply to and create new discussions, Access to members-only giveaways & competitions, Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As, Access to members-only sub forum discussions, Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio, Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free. They differ in terms of age and connection plug: the original version from the 1960s was the M 201 N("N" for "low impedance", which had to be mentioned at that time) with a 3-pole DIN plug. That said, the drop test for the TG was like, one story or something extreme like that. Cheers again. They are also hyper-cardioid, so good for focusing in on a sound area and cancelling off axis sounds more. The AT4041 pair is by far the greatest sounding pair of overhead microphones on our list thus far. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Of the two I prefer the m201. BG-150 MM-250 BG-200 MM-250 300 Series MM-300 600 Series MM-600 900 series MM-900 MM = Mic-Muff model number. SG-1 MM-101 SG-2 MM-102 SG-3 MM-103 SG-60 MM-160 SG-70 MM-170 SG-150 MM-200 SG-200 MM-200 BG-1 MM-301 BG-2 MM-302 BG-3 MM-303 BG-60 MM-360 BG-70 MM-302 Audio Technica AT-815ST MM-16 AT-822, AT-825 MM-18 AT-835b MM-21 AT-835ST MM-15 AT … hello all, im looking for a new mic mostly to use on snares. i mostly record rock drums with a clean modern sound to em. The room also sounded really bad. 2x Beyer M88 1x Beyer M201 2x Sennheiser 421 1x Sennheiser 906 Ribbons: 2x Coles 4038 1x Royer 121 1x Beyer M160 Condensers: 1x U87 AI 2x Gefell M300 2x Shure KSM32 2x Audix SCX-25a Tube: 1x Wunder CM7-GTS w/M7 capsule. Also great. Although I do like Shure stuff (I use their wireless products nearly every day), Beyerdynamic is inarguably superior kit. Microphones used: Beyer M88, Neumann U47fet, EV RE15, AKG D112, pair of DPA 4006, Beyer M201, custom-made piezo (contact) microphone. If the sound isn't rich enough, the source isn't either. It is the omni-directional version of the Beyer m201. They are perfect for cymbals, overheads, room mics, on acoustic guitar, pianos, horns, and even are useful as a snare bottom microphone. Pretty open sounding to me, almost no eq. All the m201s I've heard also have something very nice and clear going on in the low-mids. it's a great mic for top snare duties. It has the 57 signature sound with a more open sound and more bottom.. So the TG model will take a lot more use and accidental abuse than the standard models. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. All great. The silver grilles on the pre-TG models were prone to denting, and beneath was a plastic ring with fingers which would crack and bend over. The Beyer M201 is considered the fancyman's SM57. Still need to try the Cads on toms before I buy more mics though. Warm Audio worked closely with Altran to create these, using a vintage winding technique to get the larger-than-life API sound. Are there any differences in sound? I like them on snare a lot but was told to try them on toms. I'm going to try this today. Tape Op reviewed the SM7 all the way back in 2003 but is just catching up with the M 88 now. I've used the 201 on banjo in an old style jazzband. I like the i5 on just about anything. It lacks the instantly-recognizable visual profile of its closest competitors, the Electro-Voice RE20/PL20 and the Shure SM7, and it cannot rival the RE20 in studio ubiquity (which falls only slightly short of the notorious SM57 and D 112). Quote: Originally Posted by Rob Coates Did a couple of songs live on terrestrial radio once. Microphones from beyerdynamic: microphones with the best audio quality for all applications. Stereo Microphones Instrumental Microphones Vocal Microphones Stage Wireless Microphones Buy now online! beyerdynamic engineers and manufactures headphones, microphones & conference systems of the highest quality. I think there are some more comparison clips over at "studio auditions dot com". Beyer stuff was more popular in Europe in the '70s and '80s. The Beyerdynamic M 201 TG is a hypercardioid dynamic microphone with a very accurate natural sound to it. The M201 is great on electric guitar to capture the "cab sound". Here at beyerdynamic Heilbronn, we have a passion for audio technology with outstanding sound quality – … Beyerdynamic's M 201 TG is a truly sensitive classic dynamic microphone with a range of applications spanning from instruments to vocals. I think I was just bored. The i5 always sounds like a flabby version of the 57. All the m201s shine in a couple of ways. The hypercardioid pattern effectively rejects bleed from the hi-hat and mounted toms. At my studio, we pretty much stay with the SM57 or the Beyer M201, but that could easily get thrown out the window, depending on the 3 things above. I haven't heard the TGs, but for what its worth I have two early tuchel era m201s. With a setup like that As a comparison the Beyer M201 also has an ARP of £113, as does the 260. I do like the thick attack it provides, but I'm finding that I have to work harder than I want to put back the "zing." I just used 201's on toms for a metal tune. Pictures Of Mic'ed Up Drum Kits In The Studio, Already have an account? The 201 by itself has a more clear top end and does not capture the characteristic sm57 sound, but overall is more complete than the 57. The M 88 is an easy microphone to overlook. Rycote aim to solve both problems with their new designs. Same situation with 2 mics on the snare - it depends. I'll either remember what it was that I liked about the RE-16 on snare, or I'll remember why I wanted to change in the first place. The difference is evident. Consoles; MIDAS Verona 560. I think I'm going to go back to the RE-16, which I used all the time before I got my 201. These microphones give a nice and crispy high-end without sounding harsh.. The player was sitting next to the drummer and there was no significant bleed from the drums into the 201. The much more expensive MD441 is a different animal, even flatter that the well-favoured Beyer M201, with even more extended frequency response on both ends of the audio spectrum. In principle, these are one and the same microphone. Steve Albini once referred to the Beyer M201 as "what an SM57 would sound like if it was a microphone." The Sennheiser MD421 (U5 model) goes for £133 and the 441 for £169 to £185 depending on whether it's a plain old U or a fancy shmancy U-3 model. This microphone is affordable and it will last you a long time because it is built to last. It's a no brainer on snare drums, sounds great. cenafria wrote:I haven't compared M88s but other beyer mics I've heard different "vintages" of other beyer mics that sounded fine. The main user interface of LITTLE FAT KICK. Made in Germany Excellent sound experience The N2 has more high end and the N has bigger and more coherent low end. It's a no brainer on snare drums, sounds great. Thank you for posting, finding info on this was a bit of a nuisance. I have access to a good collection of U87, 414, Sony C48, MKH40, MD441, M201 etc. The discrete X520 op-amp is a reproduction of the classic 2520, designed to produce clean, open tones at moderate gain settings, yet … i mostly record rock drums with a clean modern sound to em. And for good reason - flatter response, extremely high SPL output, hypercardiod pattern. Then you start to narrow it down. beyer m201 vs. the audix i5 hello all, im looking for a new mic mostly to use on snares. It was a really horrible dull mushy phasey sound.